Friday, May 4, 2012

A Violette By Any Other Name... Is Called Crusader


It's time to settle in with a cup of tea, and indulge in this long Love letter to two of the ceramic horse world's most beloved sculptures: "Sespe Violette" and "Crusader". 




As discussed in the prior post about Nataf, many of the Hagen-Renaker models were styled after real horses. Hagen-Renaker pottery's Sespe Violette model was a portrait of a real horse, living and working in Southern California. Maureen Love probably sculpted her in 1953, since the first examples were released in Spring of 1954. 



Original HR Sales Sheet for SV, Fall 1954


The real Sespe Violette was foaled on May 11th, 1944, and bears the Belgian Draft Horse Corp. of America's registration #M32116. She was in fact, a mare, despite her rather masculine physical and tacked appearance. As collector Cynthia Perry points out, "I always found it rather odd that 'Sespe' was tricked out in a stallion surcingle, when generally draft mares are shown in a halter only!"

Maureen herself glazed this casting of Sespe Violette, but it is interesting to note that the registered markings for the real SV are quite different.


Photo courtesy collector K. Bean


Photo courtesy collector K. Bean


Photo courtesy collector K. Bean


Horse in background is a regular factory finish Monrovia era example. Photo courtesy collector K. Bean




Owned by K. Bean, photo courtesy D. West.



Below is an example of a factory-produced (OF) SV, which is much closer to the real mare's registered description: "dark sorrel, star, light short stripe below eyes, mane light, black hooves." There is no notation at all about any white leg markings. This probably means that the white color HR used was meant to represent her pangare or pale chestnut hairs on her lower legs, but they stayed true to her black hooves! 



Dark Monrovia version, photo courtesy K. Wellman.


A lighter Monrovia, photo courtesy K. Wellman.


An even lighter Monrovia, photo courtesy K. Wellman.

The Belgian Draft Horse Corp. was very helpful and friendly, but apologized that their electronic records do not yet include the older registered entries, some of which were handwritten. Both of Sespe Violette's parents fall into this category. All I can tell you is that her sire is #S19959 and her dam is #M19287. If you happen to access an old studbook of 1942-1944, I'd love to know their names.

The real SV was first owned by Rancho Sespe of Fillmore, CA. While no information on their Belgian breeding program was readily available, here is an adorable crate label for the farm's citrus, its best-known produce. Imagine standing your Sespe on a printout of that in a Collectibility class at a live show? Or shrinking the image, and having her haul a wagon full of crates for Performance? 





There is yet another potentially accurate performance entry for this sculpture. The story goes that SV was one of the Belgians who pulled the starting gate for Santa Anita. If true, it makes sense that Maureen would have seen her there, as she regularly sketched the Thoroughbreds at Santa Anita, during their morning workouts. The Belgians also had the duty of harrowing the track for the races. There were different Belgian teams employed, apparently owned by different people, over the years. Some of the owner names in personal recollections online are Tom Parks (Charming Alibi) and Dewey burdan. SV's owners are not connected, as far as my research probed. The earliest Santa Anita Belgian reference I found was 1939 and the latest 1974. 

Maybe somewhere in this image is a laboring Sespe Violette?



Found on Google, from Milwaukee Journal, 1939.


There is a little confusion online about the breed identity of the drafters used at Santa Anita, prior to the era of employing tractors. USC's archive patron seems to have misidentified the Belgians in this image as Clydesdales. The Belgians were the first employed, followed by the Budweiser Clydesdales, originally from the nearest Busch attraction. The Clydesdales again made a guest-pull of the 1984 Olympics equestrian events medal podium at Santa Anita. They still make an appearance for Santa Anita opening day each year, but they are no longer pulling the starting gate, just their wagon. 

This is not to imply the Belgians were frail weaklings who needed replacing. A team of Belgian geldings named "Bob" and "Leo" were retired from Santa Anita in 1954 and went straight to the same duties at another racetrack, Rillito, in Tuscon, AZ. The source claims that they "Once won a California pulling contest; at one time were the second largest Belgian draft team in the world." Not exactly pansies, nor shrinking "violettes"!

According to this sports reference, at least some of the Belgians were still employed as of 1956. Gotta love the description, "beer-truck-sized". One look at a Sespe ceramic, and you can imagine it.

Here is a tiny photo and blurb from the Arcadia Tribune, 1964. "Starting Gate Team Sam and Bud Quit Races", a rather tiny print image about the retirement of another pair of Santa Anita's Belgians. When you consider the immense strain and logistics of quickly hauling the starting gate off the track before the Thoroughbreds finished each race, it's understandable that the Belgians were retired with frequency. It was not like plodding farm work!




The closest date I found online for the Belgians' complete replacement is 1974. A longtime employee at Santa Anita informed me that, "The Belgians left in the '60-70's; the Clydesdales left in the early '90's, and they were there for ten years." 

No hard evidence of Sespe Violette's formal employment could be found online, from Santa Anita itself, nor with her registry. Her last recorded owners were Darrell and Jan Livesay of Clinchport, VA; she was last purchased April 25, 1961. Her age and date of death is unreported.

She lives on, in a sense, as a beloved ceramic portrait. I could go on about how beautifully round the draft muscling and silhouette is, and I do, quite often. I love old-type draft horses. Here are several lovely vintage glaze variations of this model, all chestnut or "sorrel", plus some oddities are included here. HR produced the Sespe Violette mold # B-567, in 1954-5, and during the San Dimas era, from Fall 1967 to Spring 1968. 



Monrovia example, photo courtesy D. West.



Monrovia example, factory goof, missing a metallic ring on her surcingle. 





San Dimas example, owned by J. Pook, photo courtesy D. West.


San Dimas factory unique glaze or possible test, photo courtesy D. West.
Note the different tack and braid colors.
This piece came from the estate of former HR decorator Marie Benzango.
This piece was originally mounted to a redwood base, which was a rare means of marketing some HRs in the late 1960's.
The base crumbled in shipping, but the photo below shows the original condition.





San Dimas example, photo courtesy D. West.


Very dark San Dimas example.
Photo courtesy of Hagen-Renaker Pottery: Horses and Other Figurines by Nancy Kelly, Schiffer Publishing Ltd.


My observation is that the Sespe mold sculptures are different between the Monrovia and San Dimas factories by the following points: the faces have different profiles; cheekbones have different curves and angles; ears are different; different neck wrinkles. Even a crispy Monrovia SV head is softer in detail than a typical San Dimas SV.



Left: Monrovia SV; right: San Dimas SV, photos courtesy D. West.



Left: Monrovia SV by author. This is considered a very crisp example of Monrovia SV, as even her mane crest hairs are sharp.
Right: San Dimas SV by D. West. My apologies that the angles aren't a perfect match, and it is the unusual glaze one. 


Speaking of mold differences, the later SV mold derivation is titled, "Crusader", and is designated as a Percheron. This appears to not be styled after a specific Percheron. There was a Crusader 1523, gray filly, foaled in 1874, but that is the closest without added words in the name. The name may have come from the breed's origin story, linked with the Crusades.



Original HR Sales Sheet for Crusader, Spring 1959


Crusader is mold # B-706, produced in variably gray-shaded white in the Monrovia era from Spring 1959 to Spring 1960, and then in San Dimas from Spring 1966 to Spring 1967. As with the two eras of SV, the Monrovia and San Dimas Crusaders appear to have different face details. As usual, San Dimas is more angular, narrower in profile, and sharp. 




Monrovia era Crusader.


Some collectors don't like crackle, but how can one not love crackle, when it follows real hair growth patterns?


These two different colored and styled eyes are on the same model above.
Factory goof? I would say so.



Monrovia era Crusader, photo courtesy D. West.


San Dimas era Crusader, photo courtesy D. West.


Maureen personally glazed this Crusader. It is the one shown for the mold's entry in the Charlton Standard Catalogue of Hagen-Renaker.





Just to be double-awesome, here are photos from a photoshoot by K. Bean, a rare moment with both Maureen-glazed molds in the same location. These images make me indescribably happy. 






This chart was meant to give some idea of the mold differences, but resulted in a relationship of casting thickness (thick clay walls = heavier) to the horses' measurements. It's interesting to note the Charlton HR Handbook gives 6" tall for Sespe, and 6.25" tall for Crusader. 





The most notable differences between SV and Crusader are the Crusader's reduced leg feathering, loose mane and tail, and lack of any tack.


Note in each photo, Crusader's heels are free of feathers. Sespe's are webbed with hair.






Hair and braid detail of Sespe's tail.


When the Monrovia Sespe on the left was pulled out of the mold, 
her right legs were tugged slightly, but they were not straightened before drying. 
This is why she has a winging out foreleg and pointing-right hindhoof.
The Crusader is normal.



Mane and crest detail. Note the different neck wrinkles.


Collector values (not necessarily what eBay brings) of vintage Sespe Violette models flutter around $1,000-1,200, and a crisp, vintage Crusader may bring $900. However, condition, glaze free of flaws, and mold detail are key to the high end values. Most of the examples shown in this post are outstanding and some are even one-of-a-kind glazes; their values range 2-5x the collector value of a "regular" SV or Crusader, depending on who glazed it and when.

You may be thinking, "That's it. That's all there is to say about these."



Test San Marcos Crusader, photo courtesy C. Perry.


And then, I blew your mind with the San Marcos Crusaders. Yes, and they almost happened, too! This San Marcos test Crusader was one of the oddities that my friends (with me the tag-along) picked up at Skip's and shipped carefully to a grateful collector, back in the mid-1990's. Cynthia Perry is that original owner, and she shares the following about its origin:

"Color: test gloss rose grey

Production: One of 4 test San Marcos ‘Crusaders’

Before the end of the San Marcos era in 1986, H-R considered re-releasing ‘Crusader’ as a special run for Karen Grimm of Black Horse Ranch. However, the factory decided against it when a single collector complained that a re-release would harm values on original Monrovia and San Dimas era pieces.

FOUR test San Marcos ‘Crusader’ Percheron pieces were produced, this gloss rose grey, a similar rose grey in matte, a gloss rose grey with a dark mane and tail and an unusual “bay” with black mane and tail, but no dark points.

Of those four tests, three were sold by H-R in a group lot to Karen Grimm of Black Horse Ranch. The last piece remained in the hands of a former H-R moldmaker, who sold it privately at a later date."


You have not missed your chance to obtain one of these charming draft horses at a reasonable price. The HR factory reconsidered the above argument of loss of value, and is currently offering the reissue Sespe Violette in a range of colors. It appears to be the San Dimas mold version.



Reissue test glossy chestnut, photo courtesy D. West.



In closing, on Friday, May 11th, don't forget to wish the real "Sespe Violette" a Happy 68th Birthday, wherever she may be! I think I'll ask for a reissue Sespe, in celebration of her birthday. A birthday gift by any other date would be as sweet!


UPDATE 6/9/2015:

It was great to finally see one of the elusive Japan copies of the Crusader mold. There are actually several different ones out there, including a reverse copy with jewels for eyes! In the comments below, a collector included links to their copy, stating it is a direct recast. 




I grabbed one of my authentic Crusader photos, then matched the cropping, and resized to match the collector's image. Then, I overlaid her image to determine if they were same mold. 




The head and jaw is the most obvious difference, followed by stance of legs. Crusader also has different shapes to her light leg feathering, as well as different ear position. If one exams the other angles of the copy, the mane is completely different from Crusader. It is likely that the designer was following a Crusader as their guide, but it is clearly sculpted by another hand. It is a very handsome copy, and I would like to find one, someday!



References


Anonymous. "Mighty Belgians Get Santa Anita Track In Shape." Milwaukee Journal 10 Feb. 1939: 22.

Belgian Draft Horse Corp. of America.  http://www.belgiancorp.com/

Benuish, Alison, ed. Hagen-Renaker Research Materials: 1949- Present. N. pag. Salisbury, MD: WMHC, 1995.

eBay.com

Haupt, Steve. Thread: "Army farriers in WWII and Japan." Society of the Military Horse internet forum. Post #17, April 20, 2012. 
http://www.militaryhorse.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11405

Kelly, Nancy. Hagen-Renaker Pottery: Horses and Other Figurines. Page 154. Schiffer Publishing, Ltd.: Atglen, PA, 2000.

Kelly, Nancy. Hagen-Renaker: Through The Years. Page 76. Schiffer Publishing, Ltd.: Atglen, PA, 2001.

Kelly, Nancy. Horse, Bird, and Wildlife Figures of Maureen Love: Hagen-Renaker and Beyond. Pp. 6, 77. Schiffer Publishing, Ltd.: Atglen, PA, 2003.

Murphy, Pat. "Hoofbeats" column. Santa Ynez Valley Journal. Feb. 8, 2010. 5/2/2012.
http://www.santaynezvalleyjournal.com/archive/8/7/5957/

Pers. comm., unidentified Santa Anita Park long term employee, 5/3/2012.

Pers. comm., Jane at The Belgian Draft Horse Corporation, 5/2/2012.

Roller, Gayle. Hagen-Renaker: A Charlton Standard Guide. Third Edition. The Charlton Press: Palm Harbor, FL, 2003.

"Scanned Document." Rillito Race Track Final Significance. Page 18. 1986. 5/2/2012.
cms3.tucsonaz.gov/.../rillito_racetrack-chute_final_significance.pdf

USC Digital Library
http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/search/controller/view/chs-m11495.html?x=1299463315590

West, Dara. Pers. comm. 4/30- 5/4/2012.



Saturday, April 28, 2012

Giants Are Real

Last month's post closed with, "It looks like we're inching closer to finding an example of the elusive giant 26-inch "Leg Out" 239, that would have been the opposite of the known 25" Lane/Bil-Mar giant H-1 mold." I'm no prophet, but the time has indeed arrived for the Giant Leg-Out horse to be embraced by collector awareness. Sharp-eyed collector Dee Whitley not only found one, she found two! The one she let stay in the shop was described as the White Pearl with  "the purple & gold coloring just like in one of the pics on your web post". 

That is the first time I've heard of White Pearl in combination with another colourway on one horse. The Lane she brought home is "Bronze Brown" with Gold, as shown in her photos below. It looks similar to other Lane Black with Gold OFs in these photos, but it is truly bronze in color. Congratulations, and thank you for sharing, Dee!



24.25" tall x 15" wide!


Note that, like the Giant Rearing Facing Right mate when compared with its smaller versions, 
this large version is not a purely mechanical enlargement of the little 239.
It appears to be a completely different sculpture, in and of itself.


This shot shows off his bronze-chocolate color best.


The Giant Leg-Out is mold number H-114.


But wait, there's more! 

Another Giant discovery has enhanced our knowledge of these "Mystery Horses". Although a completely different color glaze, this fellow is an authentic factory finish Lane Giant Rearing Facing Right. This mold is the mate to the Giant mold above, however, this particular color is in the family with the Mustard H-1 (the small 14" guys).


This version measures 24" x 18" wide, a perfect mate to the Giant above.


Giant Rearing Facing Right is mold number H-11.


As is the case with most Lanes, the OF Giant Facing Right has an inscribed base bottom surface, while hobby molds are open-bottom.* This confirms my suspicion that the bronze glaze of this design shown in my earlier blog entries is, in fact, the Bil-Mar #524 Large Rearing Horse hobby mold glazed by a private hobbyist. Case closed on that fellow!

This is a good time to review the mold identity number sequence, since we're adding some official mold numbers to the list today. This Giant Leg-Out is mold number H-114, which makes no sense  in relation to the other mold numbers of its own smaller versions, the 239, the Bent-Leg 1156, and the added-base 2103. 

This is because it is numbered in relation to its Giant mate, although not in normal sequence. They just added on a number at the end to subsequent molds. Giant Leg-Out (Facing Left) has a 4 added on, to differentiate him from Giant Facing Right. Giant Facing Right's mold number also has a non-sequential addition of 1, to set it apart from its smaller version, the Rearing Facing Right H-1. This later adding-on of numbers to an original base number supports my speculation that the H-1 (no-branch) mold is the earliest of the Maureen Love Lanes.

So it goes: Facing Right H-1 (14"), Facing Right H-11 (24"), Facing Left Leg-Out H-114 (24").


Lane Factory Glazes Update

There are two more glaze colors to add to Bent-Leg 1156 mold's range. One of which shows zero restraint on Lane's part, the other is much more palatable to the realistic horse collector. Let's ease into this with the Smoky Black:



Look closely, the bottom one appears to be different in the mold, particularly around the hind leg, tail, and face.
Are we looking at a further derivation?


You can't say I didn't warn you. This one feels like a carnival prize, so how about calling this glaze "Cotton Candy" for now?




Here is an excellent example of their handsome woodgrain finish, on a Lane 3029 Leaf Platter. The factory really was quite good at this look. It's no wonder they put it to work on their horses, as well.



Lane did other platters, one of which has stolen my heart. I am seeking the Lane Hot Dog Platter shown on this blog.  Nothing says "family cookout" like a hot dog roasting his own kin over an open campfire. Drop me a line if you have one for sale or trade.

This is not a Lane, and not a Love, but it illustrates how the "Natural with Green Grass" glaze finish was employed by more than one pottery. I found this TV lamp fellow at a flea market, with his entire tail missing, and a mop of yarn stuffed in its place. 




The seller wanted a bit for him because he was now improved and more lifelike, and working. A moment of silence for the Pointer fire hazard... The site TV Lamps.net informs us that this is a Mar-Lita Lamp Co. TV lamp. Here is a link to a pic of their table-top lamp version of this same Pointer. The crisp mold detail on some of these is quite nice.

It's been established that several potteries did the crazy colors-with-gold-accents glazes on their own horses, but this was my first sighting of a non-Lane so similar to the Natural with Green glaze. It's even the same green shade of underglaze. Don't rely on glaze color alone to identify a Lane. The Puma posted earlier was a Lane planter, identified by the incised mold markings underneath.


Values

Thanks to more education about these horses, online auction closing prices seem to be on the rise. The increased awareness and spreading enthusiasm is giving values a little boost. Gathered from closed auctions and vintage dealer prices, here is an idea of what you might expect to pay for Love Lanes in 2012.

Giant OF Rearing, either mold: $10 to $50 (damaged)
H-1 Rearing 14": $12 (damaged) to $46
Derived Bent-Leg 1156: $34 to $42
A-9 Running: $25
Hobby mold final sale prices range $10 to $30 by size, condition, and finish. Nicely glazed ones may go higher.

I personally haven't seen any other sold values so far this year. Chime in, if you have more to add.

Thank you again to Dee Whitley for the photos and data, and thank you to Susan Candelaria for a value report. 

Keep your eyes peeled for these odd horses! Even if the horse isn't coming home with you, snap an "in the shop" photo with your phone, and send it my way. 



* The only exception in OF (factory finish) Lanes is the A-9 Running Horse version 2, which lacks both a base bottom and an incised mold number anywhere on its form. 


References:

Candelaria, Susan. Pers. comm., 4/19/2012.
eBay
Goodwill OnlineIndiana Ceramic Supply http://www.debmark.com/molds/BM/BM.php#start
Macky Molds http://www.mackymolds.com/myweb/Bil-Mar/Bil-Mar%20Index%20Page.htm
TV Lamps.net http://www.tvlamps.net/dog_lamps.html
Whitley, Dee. Pers. comm., 4/3-5/2012.



Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Splitting March Hairs, or 2012's Post Additions

First, it is possible to dig up more information on the real Nataf, if you are so inclined. A web site run by the AHA, the Arabian Horse DataSource, charges $9.95/month for membership. If you need it for longer, there are other membership options. Happily, the Nelsons' "lost" collection still exists. That is all I am permitted to share, at this time.

More Lane Colors

Here is an example of the OF Caramel Brown with Gold (or, as I described it even earlier, "deep auburn with gold"). I didn't have photo permission until now, so this is the first time this OF color has been shown here. The highest points of the sculpture tend towards a red-brown where the glaze is thinner or got hotter. Even the Mustard yellow has the tiniest hint of this on the upper ear tips, but it is a different glaze. 


H-1 v.1 in Caramel with gold encircling the body.


As with other Lanes, some Caramels have the gold overglaze only on the mane, eyes, nostrils, and hooves (and grass), and some have gold also encircling the neck and quarters. Examples of the white/pink/purple with gold on the second version H-1:


H-1 v.2 with gold encircling the body.
It is possible to collect ALL of the small molds in this matching color.



H-1 v.2 photo courtesy Scott, in this blog's Comments.


Remember how I had a bad file that wouldn't let me show you the woodgrain father-son set of 239 versions 1 and 2? I found a way to access it.




There is even a mold number (2103-USA) incised on an upper edge of the base. I forgot what they looked like in all that time, and it turns out their graining was quite distinct (I was wrong). I'd even wonder if the "son" was a further size reduction, since if the big (v.2) one is 18", it would make sonny boy about 10" tall. He's even closer to the camera, and he still looks too small to be as big as the known OF 239v.1, at 14.25" tall. 

The washy woodgrain examples are quite different. They need a new name. Molten Chocolate?




More Derived Molds

Remember my first Lane post, regarding the giant 25" H-1 (Rearing Right) mold?

"I have only seen one other example, and it was a cold-painted faux woodgrain finish."

I was wrong. What I saw as a teen was this derivation, in this exact "antique" finish, not woodgrain, and seeing it forwarded in an email jolted my memory. The added mane is what got me. Note that the base addition is an embellished style of the 239v.2 base addition, and another mold derivation example that follows. With the base addition, this ceramic is 28" tall.




It looks like we're inching closer to finding an example of the elusive giant 26" "Leg Out" 239, that would have been the opposite of the known 25" Lane/Bil-Mar giant H-1 mold. This is a mold for a cement or plaster figure, and it yields a 26" tall 239 derivation. Note the added base. While the beast that comes out of this mold is a far cry from the original, it's a hint that there really was a giant 239 Leg Out version. How? The 239v.2 is 18" tall, and even if you added 8" of base to it, it would not be proportioned in height like this. It would be a big base with a small horse atop it, instead of what we see here:






Side-By-Side Comparison of Lane H-1 Rearing Horse Original Mold
and Derived H-1 v.2 in Similar OF Color


Unlike the results of the A-9 molds comparison, these two versions are of the same production quality level. The first version is harder to find, and probably was replaced by the reinforced-forelegs second version, due to breakage. Naturally, you're going to see fewer of the older, and more delicate, first version. Of course, the V.1 is larger, since going down a mold generation shrinks the product.


Measurement
Original
H-1 v.1
Derived
H-1 v.2
Base length
6.5 inches
 6 inches
Base width
3.625
3.5
Horse length
9.75
9.5
Total height
13.875
13.5
Poll to Muzzle
2.875
2.75










Base inscriptions have © in a different place.


H-1 v.1 left, v.2 right.


The added branch in the v.2 mold connects both forelegs to base.



 That should hold us for a couple more weeks. Keep sending your photos, even the "ones that you let get away". Back to pottery work, for me!