Showing posts with label Crusader. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crusader. Show all posts

Monday, October 6, 2014

Auction Part Two: More Good, Less Bad

The Sequel, wherein I have an unexpected, surprise first-hand report.

I was pretty lucky the first time, to happen to be online when Jennifer Dodd reached out to me for values opinion, during a live auction of an estate with Monrovia Hagen-Renaker horses. 

I was doubly lucky to be asked a second time, but this time, Jennifer was contacted directly by the auctioneer with "more of those horses you like". I may have come to mind again because 1. I restored a couple of her initial lot, and 2. I happened to be located on the way to the pick up.

She messaged me some photos, and asked for values. I sent her the numbers, with their total, and the next thing I know... "Are you free?"

Well, this must have been meant to be, because I had just sent off a commission for approval ahead of deadline, so I had nothing to do on that until I heard back. I had finished demolding, and all the studio shipping and receiving for the day. Let's go save them!

Yes, the "Let's go save them!" impulse was running pretty strong in both of us. The last thing we wanted to see was any more loss and damage to these old, ceramic artworks. We didn't know what to expect, so we both grabbed boxes and wrapping materials, and tossed them in her car. These horses were in the exact same situation that damaged the others; the circumstance that we were told led to the complete obliteration of a Crusader, large white Honora, and a small rose gray Zara. We didn't want to see that painful story repeat.

Repeat, it could... for you see... the same molds that were reported as smashed to dust, were in this lot.


The only damage in this whole lot.


Before cleaning & restoration. This one has a dark ribbon.


What are the odds that the same lost molds (and in their respective colors) would appear in the next group? The auctioneer confirmed that they came from the same estate. 

Duplicates? The same horses, just held back? I will leave that to the reader to speculate, but luck certainly played some part in this. We're just grateful that the auctioneer directly reached out to collectors, and didn't just put them in some random lot of housewares.

When we arrived, the auction staff had carefully bubble-wrapped each horse, and laid them out in cardboard flats, stashed safely out of the way. We were touched that they were so careful with this group. It was pretty exciting to be the first collectors to handle these ceramics in decades, and realize that we would reunite them with their "stablemates" from the previous auction lot.

When we returned to my studio, we set straight to work cleaning them. The rubbing alcohol and gloves came out. It was a fun evening of chatter of collectors, hearts overflowing with joy and the destiny of the whole thing.



Photo by Jennifer Dodd.




All cleaned up.
Hagen-Renaker Monrovia DW Crusader.




If you recall the past Crusader/Sespe post, you may be noticing something funny about this rescued Crusader. Here is a comparison photo with a typical Crusader.




< Normal Monrovia                   Pale Rescue Monrovia >




This paleness is not an acquired thing, it can't occur with age; this is how she left the factory. Are they found any paler? Her gray shading batch is likewise tinted differently, a brown or flesh, instead of normal gray. Her mold detail is equal, but without dark shading for contrast on the edges, it is hard to see at a distance. Of course, this is exactly the sort of variation I collect, as a potter. It may not appeal to collectors seeking a competitive show horse, because it would appear flat/lacking detail on the judging table. This really was meant to be... she was meant to "find" me.

 We could not have asked for a happier ending! Those lost are safely in one piece, in collector hands. I hope this cheers all the folks who cried with us over the reported losses.


Gratitude to Jennifer Dodd, for the spontaneous sharing!

Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Healing History: Restorations

The language of glazes and clays is articulated in their flaws, color shifts, and edges. If a decorator missed a detail or an angle with the airbrush, it shouts to the experienced eye. The secrets and habits of the producers are revealed in silent, fragment-poetry. The downside of this is, on some odd level, when I see a damaged piece, it feels very negative. Badly glued breaks hurt my heart. It must be the same for a lot of vintage collectors, because it is common  to seek professional restoration for damaged pieces. Some restored pieces experience a successful show career, after rescue from a dollar box at a flea market. Other collectors just want to have a favorite old piece standing back on the shelf, for their own enjoyment. Restorations ease a visual shock or loss that is hard to explain to non-collectors.





I had not seriously considered doing professional restorations before last year, doubting my knack for translating glazed pigments to acrylics. What I knew of producing ceramics made me feel that it was impossible for cold paints to ever be visually correct. It took a few years of painting dinosaurs and other models, in mixed media, before I could develop the translation. The lining up of breaks, then filling chips with epoxy putty, is not difficult. Anyone can use sandpaper. Replicating the depth of the glazes, fooling the eye into believing the glaze continues uninterrupted, that is the real magic.




Restoration by Kristina, for a private collector.

I was previously thinking about the process in terms of, "This must be patched over with acrylic paint, then spray sealer".

The problem with thinking of it as a patch on top is that the ceramic itself is composed of layers. Stuff laying on top will always look like stuff laying on top. One has to restore the layers of glaze and underglaze pigments to replicate the optics, not just match colors. What does that mean? It means one has to think beyond matching colors.

Don't get me wrong, matching colors is very important, but it is not the only component in painting restorations. People have written me, asking me to type out how to do restorations. I can type exact instructions for glue, mixing putty, application, and sanding. I cannot explain in words how to match paint colors, because no two people perceive color alike. In fact, the eyes of an individual may perceive color differently from each other. I have a warm eye and a cold eye, and they were never damaged or diseased in any way. If you've taken a Color & Light Theory class, none of this is news to you. If you work closely with artists, you may have been involved in, or at least overhead, an argument over what color something is, as it sits, directly in front of them. This is why, even if you sit down with a restorer and watch them blend to match ceramic colors, it might only serve to confuse you. 

One can purchase color theory books, and do the exercises in acrylic paints. The exercises can teach you what looks cold and what looks warm, and whether or not your eyes have a talent for discerning colors. The lucky ducks in this field of study have something called a strong "color memory". You will know almost immediately whether you have this, and if you do, replicating colors for restorations will go very smoothly for you. It will, in fact, be confounding to observers as you mix a match on the first or second try, every single time. Yes, there really are people with this talent! If you don't have good color memory, you will have to ensure your matches with the ceramics by constantly comparing with the piece, and countless color dabs on the ceramic surface. You may find that the base colors you were using all day were completely wrong in color temperature, and you have to start the process over.




This A-shaped test swipe was not quite right.
It had to be lightened to match the hoof wall's darkest shade.

To further complicate the process, when acrylics dry, they look different than they do when you are mixing them. They are polymer-based, so they don't get mixed dry on your palette. 

You are looking at wet stuff and must either test it on a thickly-painted spot and use a blow dryer to see how close you are, or have recall of what each component will look like dry. Here is where good color memory and perhaps experience with raw underglazes will help. Raw underglazes don't resemble their mature fired colors when they are applied, either!

In the case of restoring vintage Hagen-Renakers, the slip was often tinted one color, with a contrasting color of underglaze sprayed on top as shading. So, one must match the clay color, then match the color, opacity, location, and direction of the overspray. By opacity, I mean, it is seldom the same of pigment-to-suspension ratio as the bottom (clay color) layer. For other factory ceramics, you must adapt your process.





This Beswick Zebra was decorated entirely in translucent underglazes. 
It would have been impossible to match with traditional opaque acrylics.
Restoration by Kristina, for a private collector.


You can try watering down your shading acrylics, but usually this results in dark pigment dots spaced further apart, and it courts airbrush runs. In fact, the overspray color may be need to be so translucent, that you must consider art inks and weathering products. 




I can't emphasize enough: these are great products. I have not only used these for airbrushing in this capacity, but I have also hand-brushed them on restorations and drawings. I get my airbrush inks and general airbrush supplies from TAG Team Hobbies.
(Tell Tom that Kristina sent you.)

Let's say the color matching, even dry, is achieved. The mended, sanded smooth break is painted with it. It stands out like a sore thumb. 

If you examine the glazed ends around the break, you will notice the character of the glaze. If it is a gloss glaze, this is pretty straightforward. Test the color on something else first, spray with gloss, and see what that brand of gloss spray does to that blend of dried, applied paint. 

If it is a matte or stoneware finish, it is more difficult. If stoneware, is the original clay body color showing through the decoration color in little gaps and blips? Is there a metallic or iridescent effect? 




The red-brown spots showing through this stoneware grulla are the clay body.


If matte, is it a thick, milky matte glaze? Is it more of shiny matte, a satin? Is there a hint of color tinting the deep, pooling areas of the glaze? Is it a perfectly dry, flat matte? Using pigments and sealers, one must test and match out the glaze on top. As you can imagine, this can mean completely stripping all the paint down to the break, and starting over with underpaint that looks right under the '"glaze" layer.

If you ever do restorations for others, you may be asked to do "cosmetic" work, along with an acquired-damage restoration. I personally love the idiosyncrasies of ceramics, and that includes their flaws and the fingerprints of the human beings that made them. I don't believe in correcting factory flaws ("congenital defects"). My philosophy is, "Less is more". My job is to replicate what the horse looked like when it left the factory, and that means if a color or texture flaw runs through a break, I replicate it. 



Restoration by Kristina, for a private collector.

Texture? Yes, many matte horses have a sandy or rough texture along their seams, which naturally intersect the breaks on legs. One must closely examine whether the texture is in the bottom layer- and shows up via the over-shading color- or if it is only in the clear, topmost layer. The restorer must use tools to gently replicate the texture in the appropriate layer, while that layer is still wet! It is a nail-biting race with sprayed media, in a window of about 4 seconds or less. It's easy to spy a restoration, if texture was ignored; a wide, smooth band around a leg, on a sandy-textured horse, destroys the illusion of a perfect match.

Let's look at a case study of the worst possible situation you may face when restoring:  invasive and careless old restoration work.


Restoration Case: Crusader

This Monrovia Crusader was not in the previous article about this mold, so you have not seen her before. When she arrived, I only knew she needed a leg break repaired. I didn't know the state of the older restorations to the horse; if you don't restore things yourself (or make pottery), it can slip past notice. It is common for collectors to forget how many restorations a single horse may have. Many of these pieces are decades old, and change hands regularly. The first things I noticed on this Crusader were colors that were decidedly not original finish (OF). 



Flesh on cheek, iridescent green in jawline, black in ear and crackles.



Blue? Brown?



Scales? And blue specks?


This told me that I needed to strip the entire horse of acrylic paint. I found black paint between ears, in eye corners and nostrils, and inside the pourhole. This Crusader had been painted solid black by a previous owner, sometime in the past. I used rubbing alcohol, which dries quickly, to loosen and scrape off the old paint. You don't want to use anything that stays super-wet, as it will carry pigments or dirt down into the crackle of aged pieces like this. It stains the permeable earthenware, beneath the glaze. You won't be able to get it out!

Under the paint, I found more troubles. The restorer did not adhere to the "First, do no harm" or "Less is more" philosophies. The entire restoration job was overkill in mixed media, and yet didn't properly stabilize the breaks. In multiple locations and in many ways, the restorer cut or wounded the unbroken areas of the horse and did complex but weak reinforcing. Whole sections of legs were dremelled away, and cut with a wheel, to lay in tooling resin and weakly-mixed bondo. Shallow channels were gouged through canons and joints to house putty and pins. It took me a couple days to alcohol, wipe, scrape, and dig out the undamaged canon bones' detail.



Left is Before.                            Right is After.


The broken former repair literally oozed apart in my hands. I scraped all the gummy softness out, removed the useless soft copper wire "pin" in the side channel, and proceeded to pin it with substantial 14-gauge steel, in the center of the limb. 


Former restoration's copper wire "pin", about the thickness of a horse tail hair.
All that yellow stuff is tooling resin that was poured in a leg, where ceramic had been removed.
The blue is Bondo, some of it just little pinpoints, ground into the damaged glaze surfaces.


It is worth noting that using a power drill, or a drill bit on a dremel, is dangerous for ceramics. The drill bit grabs into the clay, forces it with torque, and causes shattering. When I need to place a hole in each end to set a pin, I use a long sanding "needle" dremel bit. It has no grabbing helix.


Good                                                   Bad

The really crazy part is, under paint and bondo, the fourth leg was mint! The restorer had spilled or slathered the bondo everywhere, and then decided to paint the undamaged limb to match the other three legs. This is the opposite of what a restorer should do. The point is to retain as much original surface as possible. This horse was about 60% OF, when it came here. I think it's more like 90% OF now.


Win!





A: As she arrived, two views of same leg. The blue is Bondo showing through the previous restorer's finished work! 
B: Bondo blue, mismatched paint over-sprayed up the entire leg, and dried mud (?) on the hoof.
C: First attempt to strip old paint, finding the real knees.
D: Paint removed. Bondo that is not mixed correctly is soft and rubbery. The odd "horn" on the fetlock front is tooling resin that was dolloped on the leg. All of the dimensional excess bondo and resin had to be scraped and buzzed down!
E: First paint attempt, on thick to try to hide the bondo blue. Wrong color, too much overspray, strip it and try again.
F: Spray sealer is wet.
G: Spray sealer mellowed, after resting overnight.



A: As she arrived, with paint almost to the elbow. Bondo blue.
B: First layers of stripping.
C: Paint all off.
D: The previous restorer cut a groove across the break, into "healthy" ceramic, laid in a tiny bit of copper, and filled it with bondo.
E: After another round of Aves filling and sanding.
F: First paint attempt, wrong color, too much overspray, strip it and try again.
G: Less overspray, but the sealer ate the paint! They have always worked harmoniously, before. Strip and start over.
H: Spray sealer is wet.


A: As she arrived, with paint to the gaskins. Bondo blue.

B: First layers of stripping.
C: Paint all off.
D & E: The previous restorer cut a groove across the break, into "healthy" ceramic, laid in a tiny bit of copper, and filled it with bondo.
F: After first round of Aves filling and sanding.
G: Base coat had too much overspray, strip it and try again.
H: Completed, with factory-direction airbrushing.








 These scratches are dremel grinding skips, from the previous restorer not controlling the tool.
There were wounds through the glaze in multiple areas of the horse, some of which were OK to cover with paint.
It would have overly-darkened the whole hoof and coronet to cover this.






Restoration by Kristina, for a private collector.





That play-by-play either convinced you that the horses you want to fix yourself are completely achievable, or you are now certain you'd rather have someone else do it. That horse is one of the worst case scenarios, so few restorers will see that cross their workbench. Don't be afraid to try; all proper restoration materials can be easily removed for another try, later.

It's only been a little over a year for me, doing restorations for hire. The learning curve has been sharp, and each new job is a challenge. It is never boring! I can't wait to see what I learn in the next year. When each is completed, I enjoy the happy, warm feeling that it is "back", as the factory meant it to be.

If you are reading this blog with regularity, you already have some fondness for equine art history, and my next mission may interest you. I am restoring three plaster models by the legendary George Ford Morris. Stay tuned for the next Restoration Case at the Muddy Hoofprints blog.



Friday, May 4, 2012

A Violette By Any Other Name... Is Called Crusader


It's time to settle in with a cup of tea, and indulge in this long Love letter to two of the ceramic horse world's most beloved sculptures: "Sespe Violette" and "Crusader". 




As discussed in the prior post about Nataf, many of the Hagen-Renaker models were styled after real horses. Hagen-Renaker pottery's Sespe Violette model was a portrait of a real horse, living and working in Southern California. Maureen Love probably sculpted her in 1953, since the first examples were released in Spring of 1954. 



Original HR Sales Sheet for SV, Fall 1954


The real Sespe Violette was foaled on May 11th, 1944, and bears the Belgian Draft Horse Corp. of America's registration #M32116. She was in fact, a mare, despite her rather masculine physical and tacked appearance. As collector Cynthia Perry points out, "I always found it rather odd that 'Sespe' was tricked out in a stallion surcingle, when generally draft mares are shown in a halter only!"

Maureen herself glazed this casting of Sespe Violette, but it is interesting to note that the registered markings for the real SV are quite different.


Photo courtesy collector K. Bean


Photo courtesy collector K. Bean


Photo courtesy collector K. Bean


Horse in background is a regular factory finish Monrovia era example. Photo courtesy collector K. Bean




Owned by K. Bean, photo courtesy D. West.



Below is an example of a factory-produced (OF) SV, which is much closer to the real mare's registered description: "dark sorrel, star, light short stripe below eyes, mane light, black hooves." There is no notation at all about any white leg markings. This probably means that the white color HR used was meant to represent her pangare or pale chestnut hairs on her lower legs, but they stayed true to her black hooves! 



Dark Monrovia version, photo courtesy K. Wellman.


A lighter Monrovia, photo courtesy K. Wellman.


An even lighter Monrovia, photo courtesy K. Wellman.

The Belgian Draft Horse Corp. was very helpful and friendly, but apologized that their electronic records do not yet include the older registered entries, some of which were handwritten. Both of Sespe Violette's parents fall into this category. All I can tell you is that her sire is #S19959 and her dam is #M19287. If you happen to access an old studbook of 1942-1944, I'd love to know their names.

The real SV was first owned by Rancho Sespe of Fillmore, CA. While no information on their Belgian breeding program was readily available, here is an adorable crate label for the farm's citrus, its best-known produce. Imagine standing your Sespe on a printout of that in a Collectibility class at a live show? Or shrinking the image, and having her haul a wagon full of crates for Performance? 





There is yet another potentially accurate performance entry for this sculpture. The story goes that SV was one of the Belgians who pulled the starting gate for Santa Anita. If true, it makes sense that Maureen would have seen her there, as she regularly sketched the Thoroughbreds at Santa Anita, during their morning workouts. The Belgians also had the duty of harrowing the track for the races. There were different Belgian teams employed, apparently owned by different people, over the years. Some of the owner names in personal recollections online are Tom Parks (Charming Alibi) and Dewey burdan. SV's owners are not connected, as far as my research probed. The earliest Santa Anita Belgian reference I found was 1939 and the latest 1974. 

Maybe somewhere in this image is a laboring Sespe Violette?



Found on Google, from Milwaukee Journal, 1939.


There is a little confusion online about the breed identity of the drafters used at Santa Anita, prior to the era of employing tractors. USC's archive patron seems to have misidentified the Belgians in this image as Clydesdales. The Belgians were the first employed, followed by the Budweiser Clydesdales, originally from the nearest Busch attraction. The Clydesdales again made a guest-pull of the 1984 Olympics equestrian events medal podium at Santa Anita. They still make an appearance for Santa Anita opening day each year, but they are no longer pulling the starting gate, just their wagon. 

This is not to imply the Belgians were frail weaklings who needed replacing. A team of Belgian geldings named "Bob" and "Leo" were retired from Santa Anita in 1954 and went straight to the same duties at another racetrack, Rillito, in Tuscon, AZ. The source claims that they "Once won a California pulling contest; at one time were the second largest Belgian draft team in the world." Not exactly pansies, nor shrinking "violettes"!

According to this sports reference, at least some of the Belgians were still employed as of 1956. Gotta love the description, "beer-truck-sized". One look at a Sespe ceramic, and you can imagine it.

Here is a tiny photo and blurb from the Arcadia Tribune, 1964. "Starting Gate Team Sam and Bud Quit Races", a rather tiny print image about the retirement of another pair of Santa Anita's Belgians. When you consider the immense strain and logistics of quickly hauling the starting gate off the track before the Thoroughbreds finished each race, it's understandable that the Belgians were retired with frequency. It was not like plodding farm work!




The closest date I found online for the Belgians' complete replacement is 1974. A longtime employee at Santa Anita informed me that, "The Belgians left in the '60-70's; the Clydesdales left in the early '90's, and they were there for ten years." 

No hard evidence of Sespe Violette's formal employment could be found online, from Santa Anita itself, nor with her registry. Her last recorded owners were Darrell and Jan Livesay of Clinchport, VA; she was last purchased April 25, 1961. Her age and date of death is unreported.

She lives on, in a sense, as a beloved ceramic portrait. I could go on about how beautifully round the draft muscling and silhouette is, and I do, quite often. I love old-type draft horses. Here are several lovely vintage glaze variations of this model, all chestnut or "sorrel", plus some oddities are included here. HR produced the Sespe Violette mold # B-567, in 1954-5, and during the San Dimas era, from Fall 1967 to Spring 1968. 



Monrovia example, photo courtesy D. West.



Monrovia example, factory goof, missing a metallic ring on her surcingle. 





San Dimas example, owned by J. Pook, photo courtesy D. West.


San Dimas factory unique glaze or possible test, photo courtesy D. West.
Note the different tack and braid colors.
This piece came from the estate of former HR decorator Marie Benzango.
This piece was originally mounted to a redwood base, which was a rare means of marketing some HRs in the late 1960's.
The base crumbled in shipping, but the photo below shows the original condition.





San Dimas example, photo courtesy D. West.


Very dark San Dimas example.
Photo courtesy of Hagen-Renaker Pottery: Horses and Other Figurines by Nancy Kelly, Schiffer Publishing Ltd.


My observation is that the Sespe mold sculptures are different between the Monrovia and San Dimas factories by the following points: the faces have different profiles; cheekbones have different curves and angles; ears are different; different neck wrinkles. Even a crispy Monrovia SV head is softer in detail than a typical San Dimas SV.



Left: Monrovia SV; right: San Dimas SV, photos courtesy D. West.



Left: Monrovia SV by author. This is considered a very crisp example of Monrovia SV, as even her mane crest hairs are sharp.
Right: San Dimas SV by D. West. My apologies that the angles aren't a perfect match, and it is the unusual glaze one. 


Speaking of mold differences, the later SV mold derivation is titled, "Crusader", and is designated as a Percheron. This appears to not be styled after a specific Percheron. There was a Crusader 1523, gray filly, foaled in 1874, but that is the closest without added words in the name. The name may have come from the breed's origin story, linked with the Crusades.



Original HR Sales Sheet for Crusader, Spring 1959


Crusader is mold # B-706, produced in variably gray-shaded white in the Monrovia era from Spring 1959 to Spring 1960, and then in San Dimas from Spring 1966 to Spring 1967. As with the two eras of SV, the Monrovia and San Dimas Crusaders appear to have different face details. As usual, San Dimas is more angular, narrower in profile, and sharp. 




Monrovia era Crusader.


Some collectors don't like crackle, but how can one not love crackle, when it follows real hair growth patterns?


These two different colored and styled eyes are on the same model above.
Factory goof? I would say so.



Monrovia era Crusader, photo courtesy D. West.


San Dimas era Crusader, photo courtesy D. West.


Maureen personally glazed this Crusader. It is the one shown for the mold's entry in the Charlton Standard Catalogue of Hagen-Renaker.





Just to be double-awesome, here are photos from a photoshoot by K. Bean, a rare moment with both Maureen-glazed molds in the same location. These images make me indescribably happy. 






This chart was meant to give some idea of the mold differences, but resulted in a relationship of casting thickness (thick clay walls = heavier) to the horses' measurements. It's interesting to note the Charlton HR Handbook gives 6" tall for Sespe, and 6.25" tall for Crusader. 





The most notable differences between SV and Crusader are the Crusader's reduced leg feathering, loose mane and tail, and lack of any tack.


Note in each photo, Crusader's heels are free of feathers. Sespe's are webbed with hair.






Hair and braid detail of Sespe's tail.


When the Monrovia Sespe on the left was pulled out of the mold, 
her right legs were tugged slightly, but they were not straightened before drying. 
This is why she has a winging out foreleg and pointing-right hindhoof.
The Crusader is normal.



Mane and crest detail. Note the different neck wrinkles.


Collector values (not necessarily what eBay brings) of vintage Sespe Violette models flutter around $1,000-1,200, and a crisp, vintage Crusader may bring $900. However, condition, glaze free of flaws, and mold detail are key to the high end values. Most of the examples shown in this post are outstanding and some are even one-of-a-kind glazes; their values range 2-5x the collector value of a "regular" SV or Crusader, depending on who glazed it and when.

You may be thinking, "That's it. That's all there is to say about these."



Test San Marcos Crusader, photo courtesy C. Perry.


And then, I blew your mind with the San Marcos Crusaders. Yes, and they almost happened, too! This San Marcos test Crusader was one of the oddities that my friends (with me the tag-along) picked up at Skip's and shipped carefully to a grateful collector, back in the mid-1990's. Cynthia Perry is that original owner, and she shares the following about its origin:

"Color: test gloss rose grey

Production: One of 4 test San Marcos ‘Crusaders’

Before the end of the San Marcos era in 1986, H-R considered re-releasing ‘Crusader’ as a special run for Karen Grimm of Black Horse Ranch. However, the factory decided against it when a single collector complained that a re-release would harm values on original Monrovia and San Dimas era pieces.

FOUR test San Marcos ‘Crusader’ Percheron pieces were produced, this gloss rose grey, a similar rose grey in matte, a gloss rose grey with a dark mane and tail and an unusual “bay” with black mane and tail, but no dark points.

Of those four tests, three were sold by H-R in a group lot to Karen Grimm of Black Horse Ranch. The last piece remained in the hands of a former H-R moldmaker, who sold it privately at a later date."


You have not missed your chance to obtain one of these charming draft horses at a reasonable price. The HR factory reconsidered the above argument of loss of value, and is currently offering the reissue Sespe Violette in a range of colors. It appears to be the San Dimas mold version.



Reissue test glossy chestnut, photo courtesy D. West.



In closing, on Friday, May 11th, don't forget to wish the real "Sespe Violette" a Happy 68th Birthday, wherever she may be! I think I'll ask for a reissue Sespe, in celebration of her birthday. A birthday gift by any other date would be as sweet!


UPDATE 6/9/2015:

It was great to finally see one of the elusive Japan copies of the Crusader mold. There are actually several different ones out there, including a reverse copy with jewels for eyes! In the comments below, a collector included links to their copy, stating it is a direct recast. 




I grabbed one of my authentic Crusader photos, then matched the cropping, and resized to match the collector's image. Then, I overlaid her image to determine if they were same mold. 




The head and jaw is the most obvious difference, followed by stance of legs. Crusader also has different shapes to her light leg feathering, as well as different ear position. If one exams the other angles of the copy, the mane is completely different from Crusader. It is likely that the designer was following a Crusader as their guide, but it is clearly sculpted by another hand. It is a very handsome copy, and I would like to find one, someday!



References


Anonymous. "Mighty Belgians Get Santa Anita Track In Shape." Milwaukee Journal 10 Feb. 1939: 22.

Belgian Draft Horse Corp. of America.  http://www.belgiancorp.com/

Benuish, Alison, ed. Hagen-Renaker Research Materials: 1949- Present. N. pag. Salisbury, MD: WMHC, 1995.

eBay.com

Haupt, Steve. Thread: "Army farriers in WWII and Japan." Society of the Military Horse internet forum. Post #17, April 20, 2012. 
http://www.militaryhorse.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11405

Kelly, Nancy. Hagen-Renaker Pottery: Horses and Other Figurines. Page 154. Schiffer Publishing, Ltd.: Atglen, PA, 2000.

Kelly, Nancy. Hagen-Renaker: Through The Years. Page 76. Schiffer Publishing, Ltd.: Atglen, PA, 2001.

Kelly, Nancy. Horse, Bird, and Wildlife Figures of Maureen Love: Hagen-Renaker and Beyond. Pp. 6, 77. Schiffer Publishing, Ltd.: Atglen, PA, 2003.

Murphy, Pat. "Hoofbeats" column. Santa Ynez Valley Journal. Feb. 8, 2010. 5/2/2012.
http://www.santaynezvalleyjournal.com/archive/8/7/5957/

Pers. comm., unidentified Santa Anita Park long term employee, 5/3/2012.

Pers. comm., Jane at The Belgian Draft Horse Corporation, 5/2/2012.

Roller, Gayle. Hagen-Renaker: A Charlton Standard Guide. Third Edition. The Charlton Press: Palm Harbor, FL, 2003.

"Scanned Document." Rillito Race Track Final Significance. Page 18. 1986. 5/2/2012.
cms3.tucsonaz.gov/.../rillito_racetrack-chute_final_significance.pdf

USC Digital Library
http://digitallibrary.usc.edu/search/controller/view/chs-m11495.html?x=1299463315590

West, Dara. Pers. comm. 4/30- 5/4/2012.